Employers
sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as
their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some
people say this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree.
Discuss both these
views and give your own opinion.
The resume is the reflection of a person’s educational
qualification and ,nowadays, the information regarding the leisure time
activities and marital status is required to be mentioned in it A section of likeminded
people believe that the inclusion of this information is essential for the
companies to select a candidate whereas others think that it is not required.
This essay will explore both sides of the argument in detail and further
discuss why I consider these details a crucial part of the job application.
On the one hand, the details of a person’s hobbies and
other interests are required to critically understood his mental aptitude. In
other words ,people who are bookworms and possess no interest in other free
time activities might have an excellent theoretical knowledge, but they will
have little experience of the actual world. Having hobbies induces multitasking
capabilities in an individual ,which in turn would improve his performance at
workplace .A recent survey by University of California conducted on a large group of employees revealed that the
workers ,who had interest outside their work ,displayed incredible efficiency
at work as compared to the staff who did not have any hobbies. Furthermore, the
knowledge of marital status is majorly included towards the recruitment of the
female workers. If they are unmarried ,there is a risk involved of them getting
relocated after marriage. This could adversely affect the companies because
they invest their time and resources in making an individual a part of their
workforce ;hence, if the worker chooses to move and resign ,it will waste the
efforts of the company and they have to repeat the process of hiring.
The supporters of the opposite view argue that the employers
should be concerned only with the educational qualifications of the person
which speak volumes of the person’s credibility. In addition to this ,asking
about someone’s interests is considered
as an invasion of the privacy ;thereby, what a person does outside the
walls of office should not be a matter of concern for the companies .Thus ,the
knowledge regarding the work should be a role criterion for the selection purposes.
To recapitulate, after weighing the arguments of both
sides I believe that the personal information plays a profound role in judging
the candidature of a person. This will aid the employers to select the best candidate
to invest their resources in and create
a highly productive workforce.